Skip to main content

Bose wants to dominate car audio, and I heard its next-gen 3D automotive speakers

Bose’s automotive audio business is huge, and it’s set to get even bigger. The company has been making big plays in car audio for some time now. The audio company works with premium brands like Porsche, building high-end speakers that allow drivers to experience high-quality audio on the road, whether they’re carting the family around in an Escalade or weaving around the highway (don’t do that) in a Porsche Macan.

But while it has a solid selection of audio brands under its belt, the world of personal audio is also evolving. Mercedes-Benz showed off its Dolby Atmos system at CES last year, and now, a year later, plenty of other brands are joining the trend. At CES 2025, Bose walked me through its current lineup of automotive audio products, as well as a sneak peek of what’s to come.

Recommended Videos

Immersive audio

The big trend in all areas of personal audio right now essentially boils down to supporting 3D audio formats like Dolby Atmos. Consumer home theater products are increasingly offering up-firing and side-firing speakers that can bounce audio around the room to simulate height and surround effects, while headphone brands are increasingly developing spatialized audio tech that can convert stereo audio into simulated spatial audio.

Now that’s extending into the car, and in a big way. As mentioned, we’re a year out from when Mercedes-Benz began showing off its Dolby Atmos-enabled speakers, and at the time, it was absolutely an impressive demo. Now others, including Bose, are working hard at offering similar technologies, and I got to experience Bose’s next-generation Atmos-enabled speaker system in a GMC Denali. While the system isn’t on the road just yet, Bose told me that it’s essentially finalized and will be shipping this year.

Indeed, the demo was quite impressive. Bose offers a few different technologies for spatialized audio, including tech that can spatialize stereo audio for a more immersive experience. Of course, it can also accept spatial audio formats as an input, avoiding having to run a spatial algorithm itself to convert audio into a spatial format.

Bose 3D audio tablet
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

But I have a confession to make. Even after the undeniably impressive demo, I still don’t like listening to music in spatial audio. Maybe I’m just getting old, but it just kind of feels a little wrong. Most music was still originally mixed for stereo listening, and oftentimes, the Dolby Atmos re-mixes are gimmicky at best. The music we listened to in an Escalade, which had Bose’s new tech, sounded spacious and immersive — but I would never listen to music originally mixed for stereo in a spatial format, and it would take a lot of getting used to for me to listen to music actually mixed for Dolby Atmos.

Perhaps some of that comes down to the idea that even the concept of spatialized music feels a little unnatural. Stereo audio allows you to play with panning to the left, the right, and anywhere in between. How is music presented when you go to a concert? Typically, it’s on a stage — in front of you to the left, the right, and anywhere in between. Sure, audio bounces around a room, but that’s a little different from it sounding like a percussionist is playing above you. I will say, though, that I do enjoy watching movies in spatial audio — when you do want as immersive of an experience as possible. Typically, though, you probably won’t be watching movies while you drive.

But I digress. The speakers built into the car did sound great, with deep and resonant bass and crisp details. And, presumably, you’ll be able to set music to play in stereo anyway. Options are good — just because I don’t like listening to music in Atmos doesn’t mean no one else should be able to.

Ultra high-end

I also had a chance to check out something else in the Bose portfolio — speakers developed by what are now Bose brands, Sonus Faber and McIntosh.

These are the speaker systems that I really enjoyed listening to. Bose is just as much a tech company as an audio company, but the likes of Sonus Faber and McIntosh are traditional audio companies with a goal of simply creating the best audio they can — even if that means building speakers that cost $700,000.

McIntosh meters in a car
Christian de Looper / Digital Trends

I won’t dwell too long on this — nothing that I saw from Sonus Faber and McIntosh at the show was actually new. But I will say that Bose’s acquisition of the brands makes a little more sense in the context of automotive. Sitting in a Jeep Wagoneer S with speakers built into it, I experienced what could be among the best automotive speaker system out there right now. Audio was incredibly crisp and spacious, with every single instrument getting its own space in the mix. In this demo, audio was in stereo, and I loved it. Oh, and I also happened to get a demo of the $700,000 Sonus Faber speakers. Pumping volume up to 70% in the T-Mobile Arena was an audio experience I likely won’t forget soon. It was loud … but the system is amongst the best-sounding I’ve ever heard, and as an audiophile with a background in studio recording, I’ve heard plenty of great-sounding systems.

I will say, however, that Bose’s acquisition of the brands makes a little more sense in the context of automotive. I just hope Bose at least lets them stick to what they’re doing when it comes to the development of ultra-premium speaker systems and power amplifiers without forcing tech that customers of the brands don’t want or need.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
Toyota shifts gears: 15 New EVs and a million cars by 2027
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

After years of cautiously navigating the electric vehicle (EV) market, Toyota is finally ramping up its commitment to fully electric vehicles.
The Japanese automaker, which has long relied on hybrids, is now planning to develop about 15 fully electric models by 2027, up from five currently. These models will include vehicles under the Toyota and Lexus brands, with production expected to reach 1 million units annually by that year, according to a report from Nikkei.
This strategy marks a significant shift for Toyota, which has thus far remained conservative in its approach to electric cars. The company sold just 140,000 EVs globally in 2024—representing less than 2% of its total global sales. Despite this, Toyota is aiming for a much larger presence in the EV market, targeting approximately 35% of its global production to be electric by the end of the decade.
The Nikkei report suggests the company plans to diversify its production footprint beyond Japan and China and expanding into the U.S., Thailand, and Argentina. This would help mitigate the impact of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all car imports, as well as reduce delivery times. Toyota is also building a battery plant in North Carolina.
For now, Toyota has only two fully electric vehicles on the U.S. market: The bZ4X  and the Lexus RZ models. The Japanese automaker is expected to introduce new models like the bZ5X and a potential electric version of the popular Tacoma pickup.
Separately, Toyota and Honda, along with South Korea’s Hyundai, all announced on April 4 that they would not be raising prices, at least over the next couple of months, following the imposition of U.S. tariffs. According to a separate Nikkei report, Toyota’s North American division has told its suppliers that it will absorb the extra costs of parts imported from Mexico and Canada. Another 25% for automotive parts imported to the U.S. is slated to come into effect on May 3.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Audi halts vehicle deliveries to the U.S. as it mulls impact of tariffs
2021 Audi Q5

If you’d been thinking of buying an Audi, now might be the time.  The German brand, owned by the Volkswagen Group, has announced it would halt shipments to the U.S. in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all imported vehicles.
Audi is currently holding cars that arrived after the tariffs took effect, on April 3, in U.S. ports. But it still has around 37,000 vehicles in its U.S. inventory, which should be able to meet demand for about two months, according to Reuters.
Automakers on average hold enough cars to meet U.S. demand for about three months, according to Cox Automotive.
Audi should be particularly affected by the tariffs: The Q5, its best-selling model in the U.S., is produced in Mexico, while other models, such as the A3, A4, and A6 are produced in Germany.
Holding shipments is obviously a temporary measure to buy time for Audi and parent company Volkswagen. If tariffs stay in place, vehicle prices would likely have to go up accordingly, unless some production is shifted to the U.S. Volkswagen already has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is planning a new plant in South Carolina. That latter plant, however, isn’t expected to be operational until 2027 and is currently dedicated to building electric vehicles for VW’s Scout Motors brand.
Other global automakers have also taken drastic measures in response to Trump’s tariffs. Jaguar Land Rover on April 5 said it is pausing shipments of its its UK-made cars to the United States this month. The British sports-luxury vehicle maker noted that the U.S. market accounts for nearly a quarter of its global sales, led by the likes of Range Rover Sports, Defenders, and Jaguar F-PACE.
And on April 3, Nissan, the biggest Japanese vehicle exporter to the United States, announced it will stop taking new U.S. orders for two Mexican-built Infiniti SUVs, the QX50 and QX55.

Read more